European imperialism had, at one time, been on every all but one continent, at its peak in the 20th century, 40% of people lived under colonial rule (Roser, no date). The impact of this can still be seen around the world, but the fact of the matter is that this impact is not always a positive impact, particularly in Africa. The negative impact began as early as the slave trade, when the Portuguese began taking African slaves to the Caribbean and America (Fenske et al, 2017). Other negatives include the destruction of African culture and religion, as well as the countless deaths caused by European imperialists (History and Theory of Genocide, 2011). The effects in Africa were not all bad, Europeans brought new technology to Africa, allowing…show more content…
In order to continue enjoying our site, we ask that you confirm your identity as a human. Thank you very much for your cooperation.
In order to continue enjoying our site, we ask that you confirm your identity as a human. Thank you very much for your cooperation. In order to use Sutori, you must enable Javascript in your browser. You can find instructions on how to do this here.
The Age of Imperialism and the Scramble for Africa had a major impact in the continent of Africa and left a considerable legacy that still affects the continent today. More specifically, European imperialism in Africa unfolded as a series of major events that resulted in the major European powers taking control over large sections of Africa. Each of these major events had an impact on Africa in both the past and still today. As well, historians have identified both the positive and negative impacts of European imperialism in Africa.
*Editors note: The period of European imperialism in Africa was devastating for the African people and led to many hardships. These 'positives' are not meant to dismiss the terrible atrocities committed against the African people. As stated above, historians have identified both positive and negative impacts from the period of European imperialism in Africa. In fact, there were several main positive outcomes from the period. First, the main European powers (Britain, France, Spain, Portugal, Germany, Belgium, etc.) that imperialized Africa established colonies to benefit their own economies in Europe. As such, European imperialism in Africa was beneficial for the European nations in that it helped grow their national economies. This was done by extracting important natural resources out of Africa and using them to benefit European companies and governments. With that said, the European extraction of these resources obviously had devastating impacts on African societies. These negative impacts are discussed in the section below. For instance, Leopold II of Belgium famously exploited the people of the Congo in order to gather and sell as much rubber from the region as possible. This made Leopold II an incredibly wealthy person and benefited Belgium, but had terrible impacts for the people of the Congo. Another positive impact of European imperialism in Africa was the construction of major infrastructure projects. For instance, in order to extract the resources out of Africa, the European nations built vast transportation networks throughout Africa that included railroads, bridges, roads, and harbors. While, this transportation system was used to exploit the African people it also benefitted Africa economically because it created a network of routes that were useful to the continent well into the 20th century. As well, many of the European powers developed their colonies by building sanitation systems and improving medical and education systems. The medical and educational advances led to the construction of hospitals and schools across the different regions of Africa, which benefitted the people. Next, some historians have pointed out that European colonial governments also helped to introduce new crops and farming methods to parts of Africa. This helped lead to a higher production of food for the continent and gave some Africans new skills that were beneficial. As such, it could be argued that European imperialism in Africa in the 19th century led to major developments that helped improve life for some African people. Again, it should be noted that these positives came along with plenty of negatives that also brutalized the African people. While there were some positive aspects of European imperialism in Africa, it is impossible to discount the negative impacts that occurred to Africa and the African people. In fact, Africa is, arguably, still suffering today from the impacts of European imperialism in the 19th century. These impacts have affected the economic, social and political life for Africans. One of the main negative impacts of European imperialism in Africa was the destruction of African traditions, culture and languages in favor of European traditions, culture and languages. For instance, the European people of the 19th century were ethnocentric and did not value the customs or traditions of the other groups of people that they encountered during the Age of Imperialism. For example, European colonists and settlers expressed a view of racial superiority over other groups. As such, European beliefs about their own supposed racial superiority helped inform their interactions with the people they encountered, including native Africans. The term that best relates to this concept is ‘ethnocentrism’, which is the concept of judging other cultures based upon the views of your own. Further to this idea is the concept of ‘eurocentrism’. Eurocentrism is similar to ethnocentrism but focuses specifically on Europeans and the views of superiority expressed in relation to the timeframe of imperialism. These Eurocentric beliefs were justified by European governments due to a concept called Social Darwinism. In short, Social Darwinism is the idea that some ethnic groups or races are superior to others and therefore more ‘fit’ to rule over those that are less ‘fit’. Together, these ethnocentric views by the major European powers of the time meant that European settlers in Africa generally suppressed native African traditions, customs and languages. For instance, while the European nations sometimes established schools and hospitals in their African colonies, these schools emphasized European culture over African culture. As such, this put immense pressure on African societies as they struggled to conform to European standards. An example of this can be seen in the spread of Christianity during the Age of Imperialism. European Christian missionaries were a common feature of the Scramble for Africa in the late 19th century. For instance, famous British missionary David Livingstone carried out early missions to Africa in the hopes of converting African leaders. The spread of Christianity in Africa undermined African religions at the time, and caused many African people to begin to look to the European colonial governments as the authority instead of their own traditional leaders. As stated above, African societies also faced economic impacts from European imperialism in the 19th century. For instance, the main European powers were primarily focused on finding and extracting resources from Africa, such as: gold, diamonds, cotton and rubber. This focus on taking valuable resources out of Africa benefitted the European home countries greatly, but stalled or harmed the economies of the African societies. As such, this robbed the African people of developing the resources for themselves. Finally, European imperialism in Africa negatively affected the African societies in terrible and devastating ways. For instance, Leopold II of Belgium famously brutalized the people of the Congo throughout his command over the Congo Free State. Leopold II served as the King of Belgium from 1865 until 1909 and oversaw the Belgian role in the Age of Imperialism and the Scramble for Africa. One of the most significant events of this period was that of King Leopold II of Belgium and his role in the Congo, which was a region in West and Central Africa. In fact, Leopold II ruled over the Congo as his personal empire and was responsible for the death of millions Congolese people. Furthermore, his brutal treatment of the local people came to symbolize the worst aspects of European imperialism in Africa.
|