Why the coexist sticker is bad

Why the coexist sticker is bad

Whenever I see a “COEXIST” sticker (like the one above) on the back bumper of a car, I can’t help but laugh. I realize that many people slap it on their vehicles under the naive assumption that they’re saying something profound in an incredibly clever way. Then again…

When you stop and think about it; when you consider the implications of that word in that context… is it really such a clever slogan after all? Is it even intelligent? I would say not. Granted, it looks cool and it sounds cooler; but if you throw away the rose-colored “let’s all just get along and have world-peace” glasses, it’s quite plain that the “COEXIST” sticker is nothing more than godless asininity dressed up in a fancy ball gown.

But wait, you say: wouldn’t it be good thing if everyone could just put aside their differences? Wouldn’t it be great if we could just be nice to one another? Wouldn’t it be fantastic if we could all just hug, hold hands, and be friends?

Sure, I reply. That’d be dandy! Smashing! Positively phenomenal!

Unfortunately, in a world desiccated and corrupted by sin, it’s impossible. Nice thought, yeah – but totally out of touch with reality. No can do, crackerjack. Sinners can’t just “be nice” and “coexist” together as one big happy family. Sinners lie. Sinners hate. Sinners kill. Sinners SIN. There can be no “peace” in sin.

But there’s another reason the sticker is false…

Behind it lies religious pluralism: the fundamentally-flawed belief that all religions are true and valid. That very idea alone worthy of head-scratching in a “what the heck?” sort of way.

Let’s see. What have we here?

  • C – the crescent moon and star of the religion of Islam
  • O – the peace symbol, or Pagan pentacle
  • E – the symbol for male and female, a Scientific equation
  • X – the star of David, standing in for Judaism
  • I – the wand and pentagram of Wiccan
  • S – the symbol for Chinese Yin-Yang
  • T – the cross of Christ, representing Christianity

Each of these religions claim something different as truth. That’s all good and well, but they cannot all be correct. If I say the sky is blue and you say it’s purple with pink polka dots, we’ve just made two contradicting statements. Either one of us is right and the other is wrong, or both of us are both wrong. Point is: we cannot both be right.

Just consider the Christian religion. It’s very foundation rests on the claim that Jesus Christ, the God-Man, is Lord and Savior; the one and only Lord and Savior. Christ says it Himself in John 14:6, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”

That’s a pretty strong statement. He doesn’t say, “I am one of many ways, one of many truths, one of many sources of life.” His claim is exclusive: you come to God by Me and by Me alone. In modern speak, that adds up to, “My way. No highway option.”

Obviously, Jesus is no pluralist. Either He’s right and all other religions are wrong; or else He’s wrong and some other view is right. In no case, however, can all religions be true and valid.

That’s about as black and white as you get.

Clearly, I believe Jesus is right. Of all the so-called “truths” – He’s the only one. And because I believe and rest my soul on that, I should live like I really do believe and rest my soul on that.

That means I’ll take my faith and it’s implications seriously. That means I’ll not be content to keep my religion to myself, to simply “be nice” and “avoid stepping on toes” while the world goes to hell in a hand-basket. That means I’ll act upon the biblical injunction to shine the light of the Gospel of Christ wherever I go. That means I’ll recognize the notion of “coexistence” for the fallacy that it is.

In the words of Charles Spurgeon,

If sinners be damned, at least let them leap to Hell over our dead bodies. And if they perish, let them perish with our arms wrapped about their knees, imploring them to stay. If Hell must be filled, let it be filled in the teeth of our exertions, and let not one go unwarned and unprayed for.

You've seen the bumper stickers that incorporate symbols from numerous faiths to form the word "coexist." This powerful image suggests a simple solution to an ancient problem. "Coexist" expresses a nearly universal sentiment—after all, aren't we tired of fighting with each other? It has become an idealistic mantra, but it is flawed and empty at its core.

Why coexist is so attractive—and so inadequate

Today, it is easier than ever to insulate oneself from the reality of ideological conflict. We filter out unwanted attention from those who are physically around us by putting our headphones on. Meanwhile we use those same headphones to reassure our own beliefs. We fill our minds with the political, social and cultural influences of our own choosing, ensuring that we face no resistance to the values that we have decided for ourselves.

With the Internet, anyone can find an entire community that will accept them as they are, no matter how obscure their beliefs. People are no longer bound by the cultural constraints of the geographic region in which they live. We don't rely on our physical community for support, validation or acceptance—we have found a path of lesser resistance.

This is a luxury that not everyone can afford. But for those who can, it creates the illusion of peace in their lives. By restricting our interactions to people who believe and think as we do, we reduce our day-to-day potential for disagreement. We fool ourselves into thinking that we are reasonable, peaceful people who have no problem getting along with anyone; we are true masters of the coexist lifestyle. The reality is that we are avoiding conflict rather than solving it.

The word "coexist" implies nothing about maintaining positive relationships with other human beings, and this is where the mantra falls tragically short. If all that is expected of me is to simply exist side-by-side with other people, then those relationships should demand no more effort on my part than my relationship with a brick wall.

Israel—a failure of coexistence

I recently moved to Israel, home to the world's most controversial religious dispute and a fitting case study for the coexist philosophy. In fact, the iconic bumper-sticker is rooted in the Israel-Palestine conflict. The design was first displayed in 2001 at the Museum on the Seam, an art museum in Jerusalem that specializes in controversial social and political topics. The original image included the Islamic crescent, the Jewish Star of David, and the Christian cross, with further embellishments added later to help commercialize the concept.

The modern state of Israel came into existence in 1948, just three years after World War II ended in Europe. Jews in Europe had been subjected to racism and violence for centuries. They eventually gained international sympathy following Hitler's "final solution"—the policy that resulted in the systematic murder of over 6 million European Jews, later referred to as the Holocaust. By 1948 hundreds of thousands of Jews from all over the world had already relocated to Israel in hope of a home where they would never be persecuted again. Since then, more than 3 million more have followed in their footsteps. One could say that they simply wanted a fair chance to coexist with the rest of the world.

However there were already people living in the land of Israel at that time. They're referred to now as the Palestinians. Millions of Jews felt that they could only be safe in a Jewish nation, but that meant sharing land, water and other local resources with their new (and predominantly Muslim) neighbors. In order to succeed, they could not be content to simply plug in their headphones and shut out those around them. Instead they had the choice to either cooperate with each other or fight for control and hope to survive.

Every period of peace between Israel and its neighbors has felt merely like a cease-fire. Even today, both sides are making efforts to coexist—that is, to prevent the next devastating outbreak of war—but they do so without making any progress on solving their core problems. This demonstrates the inherent weakness of the coexist philosophy: In the real world, it amounts to pretending like your problems don't exist. It removes the potential for healing and allows old wounds to fester until finally they can't be contained anymore.

A poignant example is the "status quo" at the Temple Mount area. The Temple Mount is the platform on which God's temple once stood, making it a holy site in both Judaism and Christianity. The Temple had been destroyed for over 630 years by the time the Al-Aqsa Mosque was built on that same platform, which eventually became the thirrd holiest site in Islam. 

The State of Israel seized control of the Temple Mount in the Six Day War of 1967, and the status quo was formulated to maintain a fragile peace that is constantly on the verge of collapse. Access to the Temple Mount and the restrictions about who can worship there are determined by the Jerusalem Islamic Waqf. Currently non-Muslims can only enter during limited hours and are not allowed to pray. These rules are actually enforced by the Israeli police—and vigorously! Both sides want the rules to be followed so that they can maintain peace.

However this doesn't stop everyone involved from growing bitter over the situation. Radical Jewish groups regularly challenge the arrangement by praying there, often resulting in a violent backlash. Muslim leaders continually accuse Israeli politicians of acting secretly to change the rules to allow Jews to pray there or worse, put it under Jewish control altogether. Instead of having an honest conversation about the lack of trust or the freedom of religious expression, both sides are concerned only with upholding an imperfect solution.

Control over the Temple Mount is not even the main obstacle to peace between Israel and the Palestinians. It is merely a representative example of how unwillingness to work through a problem can only set the stage for future conflict. This type of coexistence is a losing strategy for everyone involved. God, on the other hand, has a winning strategy!

Designed for more

Think about the personal conflicts in your life. Have you ever resolved a problem with someone by ignoring it? How will it feel when you've alienated yourself from that person but you eventually need their cooperation? Mankind was not designed to live in isolation from one another, content to coexist at a distance.

The story of our separation from one another begins with our separation from God. When Satan convinced Eve to eat from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, he convinced her that she could become like God by eating from the tree (Genesis 3:5). If that were true, then Adam and Eve could have just coexisted with God; God could have His own set of rules, and mankind could have theirs. Satan successfully obscured a vital fact: that we need God. And from this lie sprung another: that we don't need each other.

All but one human being who has ever lived has fallen victim to these two lies. But by His grace, God "has reconciled us to Himself through Jesus Christ, and has given us the ministry of reconciliation" (2 Corinthians 5:18). God was not content to coexist with a sinful mankind because He knew the truth: sin brings pain, hardship and ultimately death to everyone it touches. Instead, He has a plan to patiently and lovingly correct us, with the ultimate promise of changing us so that we are able to live with Him, without sin, forever!

Moreover, as followers of Christ, reconciliation is a vital part of the life that God has called us to live. Once we have been reconciled to God, the extent to which we can achieve peace in the world today is determined by our commitment to developing godly character. In Romans 12, Paul summarized some of the important principles that will allow us to do more than merely coexist with one another:

"Bless those who curse you; bless and do not curse. Rejoice with those who rejoice, and weep with those who weep. Be of the same mind toward one another. Do not set your mind on high things, but associate with the humble. Do not be wise in your own opinion. Repay no one evil for evil. Have regard for good things in the sight of all men. If it is possible, as much as it depends on you, live peaceably with all men" (Romans 12:14-18).

Paul's instruction teaches us that living peaceably with one another requires more than waving to each other from afar; it involves a change of heart, the right attitude, and willingness to work together. Today as society becomes more and more insular, it is tempting to seek an impersonal solution—to agree to disagree, to simply coexist. This is a dangerous trap, one that amounts to giving up on healing what has been broken.

Thankfully, God did not deal with us in this way! Instead He taught us a fundamentally better approach: "While we were still sinners, Christ died for us…when we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son" (Romans 5:8).